
I realize that I’m fighting a tidal wave of popularity by ranting against 100-calorie packs. Food manufacturers and grocery stores seem to be doubling down on them–don’t be surprised to see a 100-calorie snack aisle in your neighborhood store any day now. But besides offering a no-brainer approach to portion control, there’s not much good you can say about these craptacular snacks. Here’s a hundred reasons to leave ‘em on the store shelves…
- There’s simply no nutritional value in virtually any of them.
- I mean, like, zero.
- Nada
- Zilch.
- There’s way too many ingredients.
- Such as Maltodextrin.
- Sodium Alginate
- And Polydextrose.
- Soy Lecithin
- Sodium Acid Pyrophosphate and/or Calcium Phosphate
- Back reads like a science fair project instead of actual food
- In fact, Hostess 100 Calorie Pack Cupcakes have over 55 ingredients.
- They’re pale imitations of the real thing.
- Oreos? I’ve loved Oreos, eaten Oreos, cherished Oreos. You, 100-Calorie pack of Oreos are not Oreos.
- They’re just bad food.
- Bad bad bad.
- No vitamins.
- No minerals.
- None of the good stuff.
- All of the bad stuff.
- Generally they’re are all high-carb.
- And high sodium.
- And unhealthy fats.
- And mostly high sugar.
- They tend to cause a quick rise in insulin
- Then a subsequent drop in blood sugar.
- Which makes you hungry again sooner rather than later.
- Say you’re consuming 1,500 calories per day; 100 calories may be less than 7% of your daily caloric intake, but getting 5-10% of your daily calories from junk food makes no sense.
- The offer little to no fiber.
- Nothing that makes you feel full.
- Face it, 100-calorie packs were a diet fad that has been shown not to work.
- And they’re an environmental nightmare.
- More packaging
- More waste.
- They teach us nothing about self-control
- Nobody I know has ever not finished a 100-calorie pack.
- I dare you not to finish one.
- Double dog dare you.
- These tiny packages are marketed as “diet food”, so even though you know that it’s not really healthy, there’s a conflicting message in your head.
- Is it “diet food” or “junk food”?
- It’s junk food.
- There’s hardly any more processed foods available anywhere.
- Heavy on the high fructose corn syrup
- Google that term for a sh*tload of bad news.
- Packs are often more than twice as expensive per ounce as the products they mimic.
- If you buy a large bag of the regular Chex Mix snack and divvy up portions equal to 100 calories each, you’d only be out 25 ¢ per portion.
- That’s compared with 87¢ if you went with a 100-calorie pack.
- "Cheese Nips" are one the worst offenders, charging a whopping 279% markup on their 100-calorie pack.
- Have you not cracked Ziploc technology yet?
- I mean, really, those plastic bags are pretty easy to use, and divvying up food in small portions isn't rocket science.
- Are your math skills even worse than mine?
- 100-calorie packs are just another way to give us license to eat empty-calorie foods we don't really need.
- There are so many healthy alternatives in the 100-calorie range.
- I mean, lots and lots and lots.
- Such as half an apple with two teaspoons of peanut butter
- Or 10 cashews
- Or a dozen almonds
- Or 1 cup of baby carrots with a couple tablespoons of fat-free ranch
- Or three ounces of lean roast beef
- Or thirty grapes
- Or half a small avocado
- Or two large graham cracker squares with a teaspoon of peanut butter
- Or six ounces of fat free, sugar-free yogurt
- Or three cups of raw broccoli
- Or a banana
- Or an apple
- Or a cup of blueberries
- Or 18 cherries
- Or a large pear
- Or a handful of raisins
- Or three slices of fat-free cheese
- Or a hard-boiled egg
- Or a piece of string cheese
- Or half a bagel
- Or a cup of unsweetened applesauce
- Or a packet of fortified instant oatmeal
- Or a rice cake with 2 teaspoons of almond butter
- Or if those are too healthful for you, how about six townhouse crackers
- Or eight saltines.
- Or 10 spelt pretzels with 1 tablespoon of grain-sweetened chocolate chips
- Or a couple of ginger snaps.
- Or a granola bar.
- Or 40 thin-stick pretzels.
- I know, I know… those packs are so easy.
- How often does doing what’s “so easy” pay big dividends when you’re trying to lose weight?
- Think about the whole reason for snacking: to tide you over.
- These little nothings don’t fill you up.
- They weren’t designed to.
- One packet may quickly turn into three or four.
- Don’t tell me you’ve never had more than one 100-calorie pack in a single sitting.
- It’s not healthy just because it’s served in a tiny handful.
- Eating junk food from an early age can create an unhealthy relationship with food for kids.
- Research has found that people actually consume more high-calorie snacks when they are in small packages than large ones.
- Less = more.
- I sh*t you not.
- And smaller packages make you more likely to give in to temptation in the first place.
- After all, it’s just 100 calories.
- What’s the harm?
- Is portion size really the problem or an addiction to junk food?
- If you’re going to splurge and eat an Oreo, at least eat a real Oreo.